Good Reason News
Showing the harm of religious beliefs
Home / Ask Me Anything / archive
If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president.

Ann Coulter (via goodreasonnews)

Why doesn’t she start by not voting herself? This is the kind of thinking that baffles me. How can some women be so anti-women?

(via rosyeyes)

As much of a bitch as she is, I think she’s at least partially right about this, in that women overwhelming vote left, as do minorities, people under 35, parents with young children, and working class Americans. The only way the right-wing wins anything is by encouraging apathy and intimidation. Coulter’s right. If women don’t vote, if too few women vote, we end up with corporatist bastards running the country. In 2000 less than 55% of women voted and we got George Bush. In 2008, Over 65% of women voted and we got Barack Obama.

(via rosyeyes-deactivated20140105)

Source : goodreasonnews
If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president.
Ann Coulter

Wolf Blitzer: Are you saying society should just let him die?

Typical Republican asshole in the audience: YEAH!

Ron Paul: Blahgoggity bloogity the churches should take care of him blipbloopity blarghity there’s gold in ‘dem hills! Gold I tells ya! gleeborp parpalby!

stfuhatemongers:

There are so many reasons why this is wrong. First: even if we were talking sexes and not genders (biological/physical) there would still be more than two. Sometimes people have male sex characteristics but two x chromosomes. Sometimes it goes the opposite way. Some people have 2 x chromosomes and one y.  Some male fetuses are exposed to lots of female hormones giving them the appearance of being female. I could go on forever. My point is that it isn’t that simple. Second:   Gender is socially constructed and the two are not mutually exclusive. I can be female (sex) but male (gender). My gender could simply be undefined.   Not only is this hatemongering, it is complete ignorance about how society influences gender and how we define male and female. There are more than two genders and there are more than two sexes. (Even some doctors have misclassified children after doing every possible test.)  Yes for the majority of people it’s not complicated but for some it is.  Let people tell you where they fit in the grand scheme of things.

I’m not entirely sure why this matters to some people. Some people don’t view gender the same way you always thought it was, but it impacts your life only in the once out of every couple of hundred people you meet. Big whoop. Why would anyone make a big deal out of it? One thing I know is that this kind of reactionary anger toward something you don’t understand is a typically conservative style of thinking. Defensive, closed-minded, unmotivated fury. It reeks of immaturity and that’s the true calling card of the conservative way of life.

stfuhatemongers:

There are so many reasons why this is wrong. First: even if we were talking sexes and not genders (biological/physical) there would still be more than two. Sometimes people have male sex characteristics but two x chromosomes. Sometimes it goes the opposite way. Some people have 2 x chromosomes and one y. Some male fetuses are exposed to lots of female hormones giving them the appearance of being female. I could go on forever. My point is that it isn’t that simple. Second:   Gender is socially constructed and the two are not mutually exclusive. I can be female (sex) but male (gender). My gender could simply be undefined. Not only is this hatemongering, it is complete ignorance about how society influences gender and how we define male and female. There are more than two genders and there are more than two sexes. (Even some doctors have misclassified children after doing every possible test.) Yes for the majority of people it’s not complicated but for some it is. Let people tell you where they fit in the grand scheme of things.

I’m not entirely sure why this matters to some people. Some people don’t view gender the same way you always thought it was, but it impacts your life only in the once out of every couple of hundred people you meet. Big whoop. Why would anyone make a big deal out of it? One thing I know is that this kind of reactionary anger toward something you don’t understand is a typically conservative style of thinking. Defensive, closed-minded, unmotivated fury. It reeks of immaturity and that’s the true calling card of the conservative way of life.

Source : stfuhatemongers
This is a made up quote invented from wholecloth by a guy who runs a conspiracy website and makes a living selling paranoia books.

This is a made up quote invented from wholecloth by a guy who runs a conspiracy website and makes a living selling paranoia books.

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

Well, God is how we got here. God may have done it in the blink of the eye or he may have done it over this long period of time, I don’t know. But I know how it got started.

Joe Walsh, Republican/Deadbeat dad, tries to tell President Obama to “quit lying.” His ‘wife’ has a similar message for him.

Ron Paul supporter reconsidering “the whole eugenics thing.”

Ron Paul supporter reconsidering “the whole eugenics thing.”


A planned protest of Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) fizzled Thursday after officials reportedly cut cell phone services at some stations.

BART spokesman Linton Johnson told a KTVU reporter, who had noticed the disruption, that the public relations department had suggested that phone service be shut down.

Another BART spokesman, Jim Allison, reportedly admitted that the tactic had been “part of a larger strategy.”

But Allison later claimed that he had been mistaken and phone service was not blocked.

"I haven’t been able to find another incident in which this has happened," criminologist Casey Jordan told CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux Friday. "I think perhaps it is unprecedented, and yet that’s how these legal issues come to light and get debated. Whether it’s legal or not it hasn’t been tested in the courts. Public safety exceptions to or encroachments on our personal freedoms do happen."

"A lot of people are wondering, what happened to freedom of speech, assembly without government interference that’s protected by the First Amendment?" Malveaux asked.

"They didn’t try to shut down the protest. They simply turned off the cell service so it couldn’t become viral," Jordan explained. "It really is just a cost/benefit analysis of where your freedom of speech begins to threaten the public safety."

The group No Justice, No BART had called for the protest following a string of killings by BART police.

"We are fighting for justice for Charles Hill, Oscar Grant, Fred Collins, Bruce Seward, Jerrold Hall, Robert Greer, and all victims of BART police violence and murder," the group said. "We demand that BART disband its murderous, inept, corrupt police department."

How Rick Perry created all those jobs | Partisan Gridlock | a Chron.com blog →

The question isn’t whether Texas has created jobs, it clearly has. The question is: How, and at what cost?

Perry said in a recent interview on Fox that it’s a simple formula:

For me a red flag always goes up as soon as someone comes along, approaches a complex international problem and declares the answer ‘simple.’

Few government regulations, severe limitations on the right to sue and low taxation. Again, Perry’s right. Do those things and businesses will come to the state and create jobs.

When conservatives and libertarian whack-jobs say this I always wonder if they’re just trying to create an America where worker’s rights and unions never existed. Don’t they see that if they eliminate unions and worker’s rights people are just going to get fed up with being abused and start them up again. What’s the good they hope to influence?

What he didn’t mention was what, other job creation, happens when you give business everything it wants.

Of course tax breaks for multi-billion dollar corporations incentivize businesses to expand. They also cost the state money that it needs for schools. Given a choice, Rick Perry’s Texas went with tax breaks. Now the state’s laying off as many as 100,000 teachers. That’s not likely to help Texas improve its current high school graduation rank of 36th in the nation.

By the way, go home and ask your parents why they chose to move into the town you live in now. If they weren’t raised there or they didn’t have families there, most likely the answer will be “it was close to work and there are good schools.” Good schools is one of the top reasons people move anywhere and it’s how town’s develop. When populations develop, retailers moves in. It all starts with good schools. Perry’s got it backwards.

If chemical companies didn’t have to comply with both state and federal regulations, they could hire thousands of people. So Perry’s administration not only refuses to regulate them in any meaningful way, but attacks the federal government when it does. Texas now has a thriving chemical industry and the largest levels of airborne carcinogens in the nation.

Corporate responsibility and compliance with law are inconvenient. Making a mistake and getting sued for it is expensive. So Perry, his appointees and allies have enacted tort “reform” so draconian that now, businesses are free to do whatever they want to their employees and consumers literally without consequence. New laws and radical right-wing judges (many of them appointed by Perry) have not “limited” lawsuits, but effectively prevented entire classes of people from seeking justice of any kind.

Remember kids, ‘Tort reform’ is nothing more than a confusing term created by tobacco lobbyists to prevent American citizens from having their day in court against corporate criminals.

Today, even if a jury awards you damages against a corporation, there’s about an 87% chance that the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court (five of whose nine justices were appointed by Perry) will take it away from you, regardless of what the law says.

And that’s how they stack the deck against you: Appeals courts filled with business-always-wins republicans and unreasonable legislation like lawsuit caps.

Source :