Good Reason News
Showing the harm of religious beliefs
Home / Ask Me Anything / archive
I know it’s shopped, but it’s funny anyway.

I know it’s shopped, but it’s funny anyway.


Can’t believe I missed this story from last week. That bigoted creep who was stalking a college student, seen here defending himself on Anderson Cooper, was finally fired from his position working for the Michigan attorney general’s office.

Another example of, yes it’s his legal right to hold an opinion, but it’s the employers legal right to deem his actions unbecoming enough to toss his ass out on the street.

And as it turns out, he may have violated a few actual laws as well.

An assistant attorney general in Michigan has been fired for harassing the first openly gay president of his alma mater, the University of Michigan, the state’s top lawman announced today.

Andrew Shirvell, who could face criminal charges, “repeatedly violated office policies, engaged in borderline stalking behavior and inappropriately used state resources,” said outgoing Attorney General Mike Cox, a Republican and also a U-M alum. He said in a statement that his underling was not been fired for exercising his First Amendment rights.

Shirvell drew fire in September for writing on his personal blog that U-M Student Assembly President Chris Armstrong was “a RADICAL HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVIST, RACIST, ELITIST, & LIAR.” Shirvell said he worked on the blog on his own time, but Cox said today that Shirvell campaigned against Armstrong during work hours. Cox also said Shirvell lied to investigators.

Bet you can guess what major media outlet is making a mountain out of this mole hill.

Bet you can guess what major media outlet is making a mountain out of this mole hill.


Islamophobia may have reached a point in this country where people condemn Christians who they suspect are Muslims without ever checking the facts.

In Phoenix, Arizona, a new Christian church has residents fearing that it is an Islamic mosque.

The Light of the World multidenominational church is being built just off of Interstate 10 and features a dome-like structure.

“Since the distinctive dome shape went up, church leaders said they have received phone calls from concerned neighbors who’ve mistaken the building for an Islamic mosque,” KPHO reported.


The biggest fools that ever hit the big time, and all they gotta do is, act naturally.

Fox News isn’t partisan.

Jon Stewart during an interview with Rachel Maddow.

He’s lost me…

(via technipol)

But he’s right. They don’t back everyone who called themselves a Republican. The rest of that quote goes on to say they’re not partisan, but they are ideological and they support particular viewpoints. Fox wants to, and does, control the conversation. So if a Republican does something, like works across the aisle, he’s cooked. Just ask Charlie Crist or Arlen Spector or 2000 John McCain or any conservative or military figure who supports ending Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Just recently Rupert Murdoch complained that Bill O’Reilly is too kind to Hillary Clinton. They don’t support people, they dictate to people and they support those people who follow their instructions, as long as they do what they’re told and don’t question. They back Republicans as long as the Republican in question doesn’t step out of bounds.

People often talk about how Fox is an arm of the Republican party. I think they may have it backwards, or at least it’s going that way. Fox is more in control of the GOP now than the other way around. Fox isn’t at the Republican party’s beck & call, the Republican party answers to Fox.

Source : technipol

Jon Stewart on Rachel Maddow

5 reasons we dodged a bullet yesterday, all of them Sharron Angle

So you’re upset about the election results yesterday. Let me tell you a few things, friends. It could have been way worse. There are many reasons why Prop 19 could have been a world of trouble for California pot smokers and the Republicans could have taken the Senate if they had made a few wiser choices. Delaware is a great example. A traditionally blue state could have easily swung right if Mike Castle had won the primaries. Christine O’Donnell was a gift to the Democrats. Her unelectability gave the Dems back a seat they would have surely lost.

But there was one candidate who most got under the skin of the reasonable, perhaps because she was the ‘O’Donnell-esque’ candidate most likely to win. Here’s 5 reasons we celebrate Harry Reid’s defeat of the deplorable Sharron Angle.

5. Angle’s absolute refusal to appear before the media, vicious confrontations with reporters, inability to debate and masking of her funding is part of the worst aspects of the Tea Party trend. Their anti-transparency positions make them highly suspect. A government that hides from its constituency isn’t only dishonest, it shows that they, not the liberals, are in fact the elitists trying to run things against the will of the people.

4. The Tea Party is an ill-defined movement. In some parts of the country it’s code for some sort of modified libertarianism, think Rand Paul. In other parts, it’s anti-establishment (which may mean further right) republicanism, like Marco Rubio. But for many candidates like Miss O’Donnell, Michelle Bachmann and Sharron Angle, it’s just another name for the ever shape-shifting Christian Conservative movement. See, Christian conservatives know that at the end of the day, no matter how many Christians and conservative voters there are, they’re not what America is about. So they try to deceptively slink their way into government. When they couldn’t get creationism taught in public schools they tried to mask their intents by renaming it ‘intelligent design’ and pretending it was science. Now, they’re one of the many factions trying to hijack this Tea Party movement and Sharron Angle is one of it’s foot soldiers.

Here’s the text of an audio clip from an interview Angle did before she declared a media blackout:

Angle: I’m pro responsible choice. There is choice to abstain choice to do contraception. There are all kind of good choices.

Manders: Is there any reason at all for an abortion?

Angle: Not in my book.

Manders: So, in other words, rape and incest would not be something?

Angle: You know, I’m a Christian and I believe that God has a plan and a purpose for each one of our lives and that he can intercede in all kinds of situations and we need to have a little faith in many things.

Revealing that she has faith that there’s a god who has a plan for us, and that that plan never involves going to an abortion clinic, exposes Angle as just another church/state violator waiting to happen.

3. Although that last example used, as an example, her abortion stance, the point was really to show that her Tea Party was no different than that old Christian Right that put Bush in office. But her stance on abortion is appalling unto itself. Angle famously suggested to those raped, underage, victims of incest, people with medical emergencies, expecting mothers who would certainly go through a painful and devastating stillbirth if forced to carry to term, the terminally ill and desperately poor who wouldn’t be able to provide for a child:

Make lemons out of lemonade

2. It’s a political cliche to call a candidate out of touch with the American people, but Sharron Angle is soooooo out of touch. While conservatives in Florida are electing the son of refugees and more and more Republicans are supporting ending don’t ask don’t tell and are backing gay marriage, Angle’s bigotry sticks way out. Angle, who in the 1990’s was one of the founders of the Independent American Party in Nevada, has a long history of distributing viciously anti-gay literature with that group, including pamphlets that refer to homosexuals as sodomites and perverts and argues that there’s no constitutional right to be ‘a sodomite.’

In addition, Angle’s attack ads against Sen. Harry Reid included this famously racist ad depicting scary brown people…..sneaking over the ….uh, Mexico/Nevada border?

1. Republicans expose what businesses they are in debt to when they betray common sense. The government works for the people and it’s in the interest of the people to eradicate certain ailments, especially when an epidemic is sweeping the nation. Who came out against all the public funding Jonas Salk received when he discovered the Polio vaccine? He was put through college on the state’s dollar, his research was funded by the government and millions benefited. What selfish, heartless, child-hating, buffoon would say that the public funding of this research wasn’t vital to this nation’s continued success? Yet, Angle seems to think she knows more than every medical professional out there when it comes to our current epidemic: Autism.

Autism effects something like 1 in every 110 children born in the U.S. today. Far from asking for the government to fund research into it, like we did for Polio, all that we want is to mandate that health insurance companies insure this condition. We just don’t want them to be able to refuse service to children with autism. That is, unless we’re Sharron Angle. Instead of being sympathetic to the people whom this country is of, for and by, Angle is sympathetic to those poor health insurance companies who might not be able to use the extra $10 million dollars to fund campaigns like hers, because they’ll be busy using it to insure a child’s health. Whoever heard of such a thing!?

“They just passed the latest one. Everything they want to throw at us is covered under ‘autism’ so that’s a mandate that you have to pay for,”

‘Autism’ is in quotes there because during a speech Ms. Angle threw up some air quotes around the term as if it’s some ill-defined catch-all i.e. ‘Tea-Party.’

Do you know, where does this phrase separation of Church and State come from? Does anybody know? … Actually, that’s exactly, it was not in Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists. He was reassuring that the federal government wouldn’t trample on their religion. The exact phrase ‘separation of Church and State’ came out of Adolf Hitler’s mouth, that’s where it comes from. Next time your liberal friends talk about the separation of Church and State ask them why they’re Nazis.

Glen Urquhart, Republican Party candidate for the United States House of Representatives election in 2010, Delaware’s at-large congressional district. (via funzette)

I am starting to feel really, really bad for my readers in Delaware…

(via stfuconservatives)

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties. — Thomas Jefferson

PS: Glen Urquhart is behind by 15-points in the polls. Won’t be seeing this inbred dingbat in Washington anytime soon.

(via stfuconservatives)

Source : funzette

Losing Our Religion: The Liberal Media’s Attack on Christianity (2010) is a book-length critique of media bias by author,  journalist, and self-avowed atheist, S. E.  Cupp.
Cupp argues that the liberal media is not only unreliable, irresponsible,  and partisan[1],  but they are also guilty of inciting a “Revolution” that  will destabilize and dilute Christian America[1].  She also claims that The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, NEWSWEEK among others “mock, subvert,  pervert, corrupt, debase, and extinguish” [1] the Judeo-Christian ethic and back believers  into a dark, morally void corner of American society.

OK, so this is that woman who says she’s an atheist, but that that evil liberal media are too mean to Christians. However, I’m looking at this picture and I’m wondering: Just what the fuck is actually being sold here? And are well all this stupid, America?

Losing Our Religion: The Liberal Media’s Attack on Christianity (2010) is a book-length critique of media bias by author, journalist, and self-avowed atheist, S. E. Cupp.

Cupp argues that the liberal media is not only unreliable, irresponsible, and partisan[1], but they are also guilty of inciting a “Revolution” that will destabilize and dilute Christian America[1]. She also claims that The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, NEWSWEEK among others “mock, subvert, pervert, corrupt, debase, and extinguish[1] the Judeo-Christian ethic and back believers into a dark, morally void corner of American society.

OK, so this is that woman who says she’s an atheist, but that that evil liberal media are too mean to Christians. However, I’m looking at this picture and I’m wondering: Just what the fuck is actually being sold here? And are well all this stupid, America?