There, did I get your attention? Now, I ask you to pause in writing your response calling me a bible toting, science hating moron and at least hear what I have to say.
ugh, really? The first thing was so stupid though. What are the chances the next thing won’t be equally as stupid?
Now, in order to prove that humans have come into existence by evolution,
NOT what the evolutionary science proposes, of course.
you would first need to explain how the universe came into existence.
That’s a completely invalid premise because it’s a non-sequitur.
The leading explanation now is the so called “Big Bang theory”. This assumption is as utterly simple as its name.
Utterly simple? Let’s all take a minute to laugh at this girl.
Basically, the theory is that the entire universe created itself out of nothing,
No it isn’t, I’d explain it, but it’s a little too complex to explain in a post. I recommend going to a public library and looking up “all of science” and then coming back and talking about this before you end up looking like someone stupid enough to say…
an utterly ludicrous claim.
As Dr. John Lennox (Professor in Mathematics at Oxford University) said, “If I say “X creates X,” I presuppose the existence of X in order to account for the existence of X. To presuppose the existence of the universe to account for its existence is logically incoherent. Or put simply; “From nothing, nothing comes!” or “No-thing cannot do anything!”
So, an outside creator is the only logical explanation
That’s the argument from ignorance. You don’t know X, therefor it must have come from Y. (By the way, Y came from Y, DON’T QUESTION IT, THAT’S BLASPHEMY, IT’S MY OPINION HAVE RESPECT! I heard it all before sister.)
To argue for evolution, you also must explain how the first living cell came into existence.
No you don’t. That’s like saying to argue your cat had kittens you must first explain the entire gestation process of cats.
As we know, living things never arise from non living things.
ehhh….that’s a pretty gray area, but you clearly have a very narrow mind, so I’m just gonna laugh at you again because it’s a waste of time to explain to you how complex this assertion is.
Evolution requires non living organisms to be turned into living organisms,
No, it doesn’t, you don’t know what evolution is.
something that has never been observed.
Yeah, it actually kinda has. Like I said, try science, kid.
So, the only logical explanation for how life came into existence in the first place is that of an outside intelligence, or a divine creator.
Go to wikipedia and look up “Argument From Ignorance.”
Now I could go on for hours about the actual theory that humans evolved to the way we are over time,
I strongly doubt that. If you want, we can organize a phone conversation and I’ll tape it and post it online and we’ll see if it actually lasts hours or, more likely, about a minute or two.
but I think I have stated enough evidence that without a divine creator, we would not exist in the first place.
You haven’t posted any evidence, you just made a bunch of ill-informed assertions.
What bothers me is the fact that anyone who is opposed to the theory of evolution is written off as a nut job.
No, some of you are just plain stupid.
Creationism is called a “biblical myth” in our textbooks,
I doubt that.
and the ironic thing is that people who believe in are told “not to force their beliefs on others”, shortly before being denied any rational debate or discussion.
This debate is over. You want to have it? Travel back to the 1930s.
I see evolution as having been forced on people for so long that they accepted it. And repeating something untrue does not make it any more true.
So, all the scientific consensus on evolution is worthless because you can’t understand it? Come off it.